Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions

Millipede (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Millipede (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


:[[User:EnWikiAdmin|EnWikiAdmin]] ([[User talk:EnWikiAdmin|talk]]) 23:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
:[[User:EnWikiAdmin|EnWikiAdmin]] ([[User talk:EnWikiAdmin|talk]]) 23:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
::Here is '''[[Time-viewing device|an example]]''' that has multiple issues/problems but gives an idea of what an interesting article might include in that it synthesizes allegations regarding a common topic from a multitude of alleged witnesses, albeit from [[Ikwipedia:Acceptable sources|primary sources]] and [[Ikwipedia:testimonial accounts|testimonial accounts]]. [[User:Poseidon|Poseidon]] ([[User talk:Poseidon|talk]]) 07:44, 23 December 2024 (UTC)


::I'm not sure about any of the following.
::I'm not sure about any of the following.
Line 21: Line 23:
::Possibly, this is a bit vague so I'll give a concrete example of both.  Would [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal%20Raymond%20Rife Royal Raymond Rife] do for Ikwipedia?  The Rife device is a lot less off-the-wall than the things that are currently listed under [[Exotic technology]] since its design is mostly known (though there's argument about the details) and doesn't defy any known laws of physics and it's just whether it's effective at destroying germs that's disputed, but it is very unsuited to Wikipedia because mainstream sources tend not to discuss it except to say that there's no formal evidence that it works, and it's in the ridiculous position of having to rely largely on 1930s newspaper articles even though the inadmissible sources (websites with photos of Rife's letters and lab notes and so on) often demonstrate that the newspaper articles are wrong.  [[User:Millipede|Millipede]] ([[User talk:Millipede|talk]]) 22:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
::Possibly, this is a bit vague so I'll give a concrete example of both.  Would [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal%20Raymond%20Rife Royal Raymond Rife] do for Ikwipedia?  The Rife device is a lot less off-the-wall than the things that are currently listed under [[Exotic technology]] since its design is mostly known (though there's argument about the details) and doesn't defy any known laws of physics and it's just whether it's effective at destroying germs that's disputed, but it is very unsuited to Wikipedia because mainstream sources tend not to discuss it except to say that there's no formal evidence that it works, and it's in the ridiculous position of having to rely largely on 1930s newspaper articles even though the inadmissible sources (websites with photos of Rife's letters and lab notes and so on) often demonstrate that the newspaper articles are wrong.  [[User:Millipede|Millipede]] ([[User talk:Millipede|talk]]) 22:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)


::Here is '''[[Time-viewing device|an example]]''' that has multiple issues/problems but gives an idea of what an interesting article might include in that it synthesizes allegations regarding a common topic from a multitude of alleged witnesses, albeit from [[Ikwipedia:Acceptable sources|primary sources]] and [[Ikwipedia:testimonial accounts|testimonial accounts]]. [[User:Poseidon|Poseidon]] ([[User talk:Poseidon|talk]]) 07:44, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
=Additional information=
=Additional information=
I wanted to add this as well for anyone looking for additional information. We see our current practice of "forking" articles from Wikipedia as a reasonable starting point, but we unfortunately haven't laid out how an article should evolve from there, and we're considering changing this practice anyway.
I wanted to add this as well for anyone looking for additional information. We see our current practice of "forking" articles from Wikipedia as a reasonable starting point, but we unfortunately haven't laid out how an article should evolve from there, and we're considering changing this practice anyway.
Return to "Main Page" page.