Ikwipedia:Acceptable sources: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Put simply, Ikwipedia has a more permissive allowance on the incorporation of original research and the use of primary sources than [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Primary,_secondary,_and_tertiary_sources Wikipedia does]. Sources with [[Ikwipedia:Testimonial accounts|testimonial evidence]], among other sources, are acceptable on [[Ikwipedia:About|Ikwipedia]]. Many claims about the subjects we focus on lack extensive coverage in secondary sources, which is part of what [[Ikwipedia:Motivations for Ikwipedia|motivated the creation of Ikwipedia]]. The use of primary sources, including large blocks of material derived from [[Ikwipedia:Testimonial accounts|testimonial accounts]], is acceptable. Also, Ikwipedia editors may, to a limited extent, make [[Ikwipedia:Synthesis and interpretation of | Put simply, Ikwipedia has a more permissive allowance on the incorporation of original research and the use of primary sources than [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Primary,_secondary,_and_tertiary_sources Wikipedia does]. Sources with [[Ikwipedia:Testimonial accounts|testimonial evidence]], among other sources, are acceptable on [[Ikwipedia:About|Ikwipedia]]. Many claims about the subjects we focus on lack extensive coverage in secondary sources, which is part of what [[Ikwipedia:Motivations for Ikwipedia|motivated the creation of Ikwipedia]]. The use of primary sources, including large blocks of material derived from [[Ikwipedia:Testimonial accounts|testimonial accounts]], is acceptable. Also, Ikwipedia editors may, to a limited extent, make [[Ikwipedia:Synthesis and interpretation of source material|certain original interpretive claims, analyses, and synthetic claims about primary sources without referencing a secondary source]]. | ||
Revision as of 01:01, 6 November 2024
Put simply, Ikwipedia has a more permissive allowance on the incorporation of original research and the use of primary sources than Wikipedia does. Sources with testimonial evidence, among other sources, are acceptable on Ikwipedia. Many claims about the subjects we focus on lack extensive coverage in secondary sources, which is part of what motivated the creation of Ikwipedia. The use of primary sources, including large blocks of material derived from testimonial accounts, is acceptable. Also, Ikwipedia editors may, to a limited extent, make certain original interpretive claims, analyses, and synthetic claims about primary sources without referencing a secondary source.