Suppression of testimony of conspiracy witnesses

The suppression of testimony from individuals who witness or have knowledge of conspiracies (and who are prepared to speak publicly) is aimed at preventing their accounts from reaching the public and is one facet of the suppression of evidence in conspiracy investigations. Methods reportedly include direct threats, subtle intimidation, discrediting, destruction or confiscation of evidence, and physical harm including murder. Witnesses who might be targeted include both insiders with access to sensitive information and external witnesses.

Types of witnesses

Insiders and rules of confidentiality

Individuals working in sensitive roles are often subject to strict confidentiality agreements. Suppression of their testimony is reportedly achieved by reinforcing these rules, often in ways that combine intimidation with subtle coercion.

William Cooper recounted an example in Behold a Pale Horse. According to his account, after he and other U.S. Navy crew members saw a UFO while on duty atop the USS Tiru in 1966, a commander from naval intelligence came aboard and informally interrogated him. Cooper described the commander's reaction when Cooper told him he believed he saw a flying saucer and described his own reading of the situation:

The man began to visibly shake and he screamed obscenities at me. He threatened to put me in the brig for the rest of my life. I thought he wasn't going to stop yelling, but as suddenly as he began, he stopped.

I was confused. I had answered his question truthfully; yet I was threatened with prison. I was not afraid, but I was not very confident, either. I figured I had better take another tack. Eighteen years with my father and four years in the Air Force had taught me something. Number one was that officers just do not lose control like that, ever. Number two was that if my answer had elicited that explosion, then the next thing out of my mouth had better be something entirely different. Number three was that his response had been an act of kindness to get me to arrive at exactly that conclusion.

"Let's start all over again," he said. "What did you see out there?"

"Nothing, sir," I answered. "I didn't see a damn thing, and I'd like to get out of here just as soon as possible."

A smile spread over his face and the Captain looked relieved. "Are you sure, Cooper?" he asked.

"Yes sir," I replied, "I'm sure."

"You're a good sailor, Cooper," he said. "The Navy needs men like you. You'll go far with the Navy."

The commander presented Cooper with documents outlining legal penalties for discussing classified information, which Cooper was required to sign. These tactics illustrate how suppression combines formal protocols with psychological pressure.

External witnesses

Individuals outside of classified environments, such as civilians or non-military personnel, who witness conspiracy events are also subject to suppression efforts. Witnesses may be warned about legal consequences such as charges under national security laws. They may be subject to additional measures to reinforce their silence, including surveillance, visits from officials who reiterate the initial warnings, or disruptions to their personal or professional lives.

Methods

Intimidation and threats

This includes verbal threats, legal warnings, and physical intimidation designed to instill fear and compliance in witnesses. Psychological manipulation, such as suggesting severe consequences while remaining legally ambiguous, is also common. Legal repercussions such as fines, imprisonment, and loss of pay are frequently cited as potential consequences for breaking confidentiality agreements. Witnesses may also face harassment, such as repeated visits from officials or veiled warnings, to reinforce their silence.

False discrediting

Witnesses who persist in sharing their accounts may be targeted for escalating suppression tactics such as public discrediting, with efforts to undermine their credibility through official records or media portrayals. For example, witnesses who held sensitive positions might be misrepresented as low-ranking or uninformed to cast doubt on their accounts. Allegations of mental instability or criminal behavior may also be fabricated to undermine their reliability.

Connection to disinformation

Suppression methods often overlap with disinformation campaigns designed to discredit witnesses or obscure sensitive details. This dual approach aims to prevent the dissemination of information while simultaneously seeding doubt among the public.

Theft and destruction of witness documents

Physical evidence, such as recordings, photographs, or documents, may be confiscated or destroyed, sometimes through break-ins or other covert actions. For example, Cooper reported that federal agents confiscated his computer floppy disks, erasing digital backups of his testimony. When evidence has already been disseminated, suppression efforts may focus on halting its circulation, such as by pressuring publishers or organizers of public events to withdraw support. Events where testimony might be shared, such as public talks or media appearances, are sometimes disrupted or canceled under pretexts such as legal or safety concerns.

Targeted killing

Insiders are usually warned — explicitly or implicitly — that breaches of secrecy could lead to severe consequences, including death, threats which have reportedly been followed through on in some cases. Witnesses involved in black projects or covert operations have reportedly been targeted for killing to ensure their silence. Lethal operations are allegedly justified by the authorities to prevent revelations about alleged projects and agreements among Earth’s governing elites and extraterrestrials. Numerous unexplained deaths have been attributed to such alleged operations.