Ikwipedia:Notability: Difference between revisions

Line 10:

:'''Major wrongdoing of public concern:''' [[conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]] based on [[Ikwipedia:Testimonial accounts|testimonial accounts]]; alleged [[systemic-deception theory|systemic deception]]s; etc.

A mere ([[Ikwipedia: testimonial accounts|testimonial]]) claim alluding to the existence or validity of one or more of these topics warrants documentation of the topic(s), regardless of whether it can be verified by a particular standard of evidence. Documenting these topics in an encyclopedic way synthesizes the available information about them and shows how they interrelate, which helps to provide a more clear understanding of a [[Ikwipedia:Hypothesis of Ikwipedia|coherent framework that accounts for them all, if such a framework exists]].

To affirmatively counteract the [[Ikwipedia:Hypothesis of Ikwipedia|tendency of these topics to be concealed and actively suppressed]] it is our policy or view that <strong> a mere ([[Ikwipedia: testimonial accounts|testimonial]]) claim alluding to the existence or validity of one or more of these topics warrants documentation of the topic(s)</strong>, regardless of whether it can be verified by a particular standard of evidence. Documenting these topics in an encyclopedic way synthesizes the available information about them and shows how they interrelate, which helps to provide a more clear understanding of a [[Ikwipedia:Hypothesis of Ikwipedia|coherent framework that accounts for them all, if such a framework exists]].

==Limitations==

This permissive notability standard does not necessarily extend to all topics. Content which would not be found in a comparable Wikipedia article — even on an otherwise-notable subject and supported by otherwise-reliable sources, such as claims that primarily concern public figures' private lives — and which is not paradigm-shifting in the sense described is most likely not notable unless it specifically relates to the above topics.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :'''Major wrongdoing of public concern:''' [[conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]] based on [[Ikwipedia:Testimonial accounts|testimonial accounts]]; alleged [[systemic-deception theory|systemic deception]]s; etc.
-A mere ([[Ikwipedia: testimonial accounts|testimonial]]) claim alluding to the existence or validity of one or more of these topics warrants documentation of the topic(s), regardless of whether it can be verified by a particular standard of evidence. Documenting these topics in an encyclopedic way synthesizes the available information about them and shows how they interrelate, which helps to provide a more clear understanding of a [[Ikwipedia:Hypothesis of Ikwipedia|coherent framework that accounts for them all, if such a framework exists]].
+To affirmatively counteract the [[Ikwipedia:Hypothesis of Ikwipedia|tendency of these topics to be concealed and actively suppressed]] it is our policy or view that <strong> a mere ([[Ikwipedia: testimonial accounts|testimonial]]) claim alluding to the existence or validity of one or more of these topics warrants documentation of the topic(s)</strong>, regardless of whether it can be verified by a particular standard of evidence. Documenting these topics in an encyclopedic way synthesizes the available information about them and shows how they interrelate, which helps to provide a more clear understanding of a [[Ikwipedia:Hypothesis of Ikwipedia|coherent framework that accounts for them all, if such a framework exists]].
 ==Limitations==
 This permissive notability standard does not necessarily extend to all topics. Content which would not be found in a comparable Wikipedia article — even on an otherwise-notable subject and supported by otherwise-reliable sources, such as claims that primarily concern public figures' private lives — and which is not paradigm-shifting in the sense described is most likely not notable unless it specifically relates to the above topics.