Jonathan Reed: Difference between revisions
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
[[Freddy (Jonathan Reed)]] | *[[Freddy (Jonathan Reed)]] | ||
[[Link bracelet]] | *[[Link bracelet]] | ||
[[Men in black]] | *[[Men in black]] | ||
*''[[Coast to Coast AM]]'' | |||
''[[Coast to Coast AM]]'' | |||
Revision as of 22:21, 12 November 2024
Jonathan Reed | |
|---|---|
| Other names | (Other known aliases, if any) |
| Experience date | October 15, 1996 and on an irregular ongoing basis thereafter |
| Experience type | In-person, apparently chance encounter |
| Known for | encountered NHIB in the forest (Jonathan Reed forest incident), Jonathan Reed forest video, Examination of Freddy, link bracelet demonstrations, documenting encounter with photos and videos, allegedly kept Freddy (NHIB) in freezer |
| Website | [ ] |
| header28 = Notes | |
Jonathan Reed is an American former child psychologist, public speaker, experiencer, and contactee who is known for his alleged encounter with a nonhuman intelligent being (NHIB) and subsequent activities. He allegedly photographed and videotaped a live NHIB and its levitating obelisk at close range. He allegedly stored it in his freezer at home and made further videos and recordings of the alien. As a result of the alleged incident, he produced a video shot in the forest immediately after the incident, a video of the obelisk, an audio recording of the alien, an examination video, a Photograph of Freddy’s face, and other evidence.
Early life and background
Little is verified about Jonathan Reed's early life. He has described himself as a clinical psychologist working in Washington state, allegedly associated with the University of Washington. However, attempts to confirm his educational and professional credentials have been unsuccessful, leading to skepticism about his background. Critics have pointed out the absence of verifiable records confirming his employment or academic history.
Alleged encounter
The forest incident
On October 15, 1996, Reed claimed he went for a walk in the woods near Snoqualmie Pass, Washington, accompanied by his dog, Lucy. According to Reed, his dog ran ahead and encountered a nonhuman intelligent being (NHIB), described as a small, humanoid figure with elongated limbs and dark eyes, resembling the archetypal "grey" alien.
Reed alleged that his dog attacked the being, but the alien retaliated, causing the dog to disintegrate or be destroyed in a gruesome manner. In a state of panic and anger, Reed claimed he struck the alien with a large branch, incapacitating it. He experienced nausea, panic, and intense dissociation during and after the incident.
Immediate aftermath
Reed reported that he wrapped the incapacitated alien in a thermal blanket and transported it to his home. He claimed to have taken photographs and videos documenting the being, which he referred to as "Freddy". Reed stated that he stored the alien in his freezer to preserve it, noting that the being healed from its injuries over the following days.
He also claimed to have retrieved a mysterious artifact from the scene—a bracelet-like device he called the "Link bracelet" or "Link artifact". Reed alleged that this device possessed extraordinary properties, including teleportation and inducing altered states of consciousness.
Alleged harassment and suppression
In the days following the incident, Reed claimed he became the target of harassment. He reported that "Men in black" (MIBs) visited his home with police in tow, urging him to hand over any evidence he had collected. Reed alleged that his house was ransacked, his personal records were erased, and that he was subjected to threats and intimidation.
He claimed that his attempts to contact MUFON (MUFON) were intercepted and misdirected. Reed stated that several of his associates were murdered or coerced into silence, including a professor who was allegedly going to publicly present DNA analysis of Freddy's tissue. He claimed that he was homeless for about a year as a direct result of these events.
Public appearances and reception
Media interviews
Reed first came to public attention through an interview on the radio show Coast to Coast AM with Art Bell in 1998. He has since appeared at UFO conventions and on various media platforms, often presenting his alleged evidence and recounting his experiences.
Supporters
Some UFO researchers and enthusiasts, notably Mexican journalist Jaime Maussan, have supported Reed's claims. Maussan has featured Reed in presentations and has advocated for the authenticity of his evidence. Supporters argue that Reed's case provides valuable insight into extraterrestrial life and advanced technologies.
Skepticism and criticism
Reed's claims have been met with widespread skepticism. Critics point to supposed inconsistencies in his story, lack of verifiable credentials, lack of other witnesses, and the implausibility of his allegations. He has responded to these objections in numerous podcast interviews and a book. An investigation by the television program Fact or Faked: Paranormal Files attempted to debunk his evidence, suggesting that the photographs and videos were fabricated using special effects or props.
The link bracelet
Reed described the link bracelet as an advanced piece of alien technology. He claimed that when activated, it sometimes allowed him to teleport to another realm or dimension. Reed stated that using the device caused a distinctive sensation throughout his body. He also alleged that two Russian scientists who attempted to use the bracelet died within a week of trying it.
He claims to have demonstrated the bracelet's capabilities during a live television appearance, where he appeared to disappear and reappear after a few seconds. Reed stated that the bracelet is being kept somewhere safe such that he doesn't know where it is being kept, for his safety.
Legacy and impact
Reed's story remains a controversial topic within the UFO community. For believers, it represents a possible encounter with extraterrestrial life and serves as an example of alleged government suppression of such information. For skeptics, it is viewed as an elaborate hoax that underscores the need for critical thinking and rigorous standards of evidence in Ufology.
His case continues to be discussed in books, documentaries, and online forums, contributing to ongoing debates about the existence of extraterrestrial life and the validity of contactee experiences.