Jonathan Reed forest incident
Jonathan Reed forest incident | |
---|---|
Date | October 15, 1996 |
Location | Near Snoqualmie Pass, Washington, USA |
Type | In-person interaction, fighting |
Beings encountered | Freddy (NHIB), unidentified men in black (MIBs) |
Events claimed | Encountered NHIB in the forest, documented with photos and videos, allegedly kept NHIB in freezer |
Phenomena observed/experienced | Disintegration of dog, incapacitated alien being, levitating obelisk, teleportation via link bracelet, altered states of consciousness |
Concurrent psychological effects | Panic, nausea, dissociation |
Voluntariness | Accidental encounter, involuntary |
Physical artifacts | Link bracelet, tissue samples |
Methods used to recollect | unknown |
Date of first public claim | 1998 on Coast to Coast AM with Art Bell |
Investigated by | Jaime Maussan, UFO researchers |
Contemporaneous documentation | Photos and videos taken during and after the incident, audio recording of Freddy, videos of NHIB, video of obelisk, |
Corroborating witnesses | Garry (best friend), biologist who analyzed Freddy, others |
Contemporaneous accounts | None, allegedly due to suppression of corroborating testimony via murder of witnesses |
Suppression of evidence | Alleged confiscation of physical evidence by agents, ransacking of Reed's home, ransacking of biologist's office |
Suppression of account | Alleged harassment by MIBs, threats, alleged erasure of University of Washington personnel files, interference with media appearances, shooting |
Suppression of corroboration | Alleged murder of professor who was going to publicly present DNA analysis of Freddy's tissue, Garry is missing for years, multiple others |
Public accounts | Interviews on Coast to Coast AM, presentations by Jaime Maussan, alleged live demonstrations |
Attempts to debunk | Fact or Faked: Paranormal Files[1] , various critical analyses |
Investigations conducted | Investigations by skeptical organizations, Fact or Faked: Paranormal Files |
Investigation outcome | Unverified, suspected hoax |
The Jonathan Reed forest incident is a controversial and widely debated event that allegedly occurred on October 15, 1996, near Snoqualmie Pass, Washington, USA. Psychologist Jonathan Reed claimed to have encountered a non-human intelligent being (NHIB), later referred to as "Freddy," during a hike with his dog, Suzy. The incident has been the subject of numerous discussions in UFO and paranormal circles, as well as skepticism and debunking efforts by researchers and media outlets.[2]
Background[edit | edit source]
Jonathan Reed, a clinical psychologist, led a relatively private life before the incident. On the day in question, Reed decided to take his golden retriever, Suzy, for a hike in the forests near Snoqualmie Pass. The area is known for its dense woodlands and is a popular destination for outdoor enthusiasts.
The encounter[edit | edit source]
Initial contact[edit | edit source]
According to Reed's account, while hiking, Suzy ran ahead barking aggressively. Reed followed and witnessed his dog being disintegrated by a strange creature. In a state of shock and anger, Reed claims he attacked the being with a tree branch, striking it until it was incapacitated.[3]
Description of the being[edit | edit source]
Reed described the creature as a small, dark-skinned entity with large black eyes—characteristics commonly associated with the archetypal "Grey" aliens in UFO lore. He noted that the being wore a one-piece seamless suit and had no visible hair or ears.
The obelisk[edit | edit source]
Near the site of the encounter, Reed reported discovering a black, obelisk-shaped object levitating above the ground. He claimed that the object emitted a low-frequency hum and seemed to distort the surrounding area. Reed took photographs and videos of both the creature and the obelisk using a camera he had with him.
The link bracelet[edit | edit source]
Reed also reported finding a strange bracelet-like device on the ground near the alien and obelisk. He took the device in his disassociated stupor, thinking of it, according to his account, as much as he would a pop can that might have been littered. According to Reed, the bracelet had teleportation capabilities and could induce altered states of consciousness when worn.
Aftermath[edit | edit source]
Preservation of the being[edit | edit source]
Reed stated that he transported the incapacitated creature back to his home and stored it in a freezer to preserve it. He continued to document the being through photographs and videos, some of which were later presented during media appearances.
Alleged harassment and suppression[edit | edit source]
Following the incident, Reed claimed he became the target of harassment by unidentified men in black (MIBs) and government agents. He alleged that his home was ransacked, evidence was confiscated, and his professional credentials were erased from university records. Reed also reported that his associates, including a biologist who examined the being and his best friend Garry, either went missing or were found dead under mysterious circumstances.[4] Reed was allegedly severely traumatized by the incident and targeted by "deep state" operatives as a result of his attempts to publicize the incident.
Public disclosure[edit | edit source]
Coast to Coast AM appearance[edit | edit source]
Reed first went public with his story in 1998 during an interview with Art Bell on the radio show Coast to Coast AM.[3] The program is known for exploring paranormal and fringe topics, and Reed's account garnered significant attention from the UFO community.
Collaborations with Jaime Maussan[edit | edit source]
Mexican journalist and UFO researcher Jaime Maussan became one of Reed's most prominent supporters. Maussan featured Reed in several presentations and conferences, showcasing the alleged evidence, including photographs, videos, and the Link Artifact.[4]
Media demonstrations[edit | edit source]
Reed conducted live demonstrations where he showcased the Link Artifact's supposed abilities. Videos from these events depict attendees reacting to unusual phenomena, although skeptics argue that these demonstrations lack scientific validation.[5]
Investigations and skepticism[edit | edit source]
Fact or Faked: Paranormal Files[edit | edit source]
In 2010, the television show Fact or Faked: Paranormal Files investigated Reed's claims.[2] The team attempted to recreate the photographs and videos presented by Reed. They concluded that the evidence could be easily fabricated using practical effects, casting doubt on the authenticity of Reed's story. The team themselves have been criticized for their alleged lack of credentials and lack of explanation for certain aspects of Reed's videos that are allegedly difficult to fake.[citation needed].
Skeptical analyses[edit | edit source]
Multiple UFO researchers and skeptics have dissected Reed's account, pointing out inconsistencies and lack of verifiable evidence. Critics highlight that no physical evidence has been made available for independent analysis and that Reed's academic credentials could not be substantiated.[6]
Allegations of hoax[edit | edit source]
The majority of the UFO research communityTemplate:Who? considers the Jonathan Reed forest incident to be a hoax. MUFON, a masthead of the institutional UFO research community establishment, was allegedly infiltrated or intercepted by deep state agents, such that were able to allegedly stole some of Reed's most compelling evidence before it was publicized. The supposed lack of credible evidence, combined with Reed's supposed refusal to allow independent examination of the Link artifact or any biological samples, has reinforced this perspective.[7]
Legacy[edit | edit source]
Despite widespread skepticism, the Jonathan Reed forest incident remains a topic of interest within certain circles of the UFO community. The story has been cited in discussions about government suppression of extraterrestrial encounters and the challenges faced by alleged experiencers in bringing their stories to light.
Related incidents[edit | edit source]
While Reed's account is unique in its specific details, it shares common themes with other reported alien encounters, such as alleged government harassment and the discovery of advanced alien technology.
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ "Sasquatch Sprint/Alien Attacker". Fact or Faked: Paranormal Files. Season 1. 2010-11-11. Syfy. Retrieved 2024-11-06.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 "Sasquatch Sprint/Alien Attacker". Fact or Faked: Paranormal Files. Season 1. 2010-11-11. Syfy. Retrieved 2024-11-06.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Bell, Art (1998). "Jonathan Reed Alien Encounter Interview". Coast to Coast AM. Retrieved 2024-11-06.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Maussan, Jaime (1999–2005). Presentations featuring Jonathan Reed. Various UFO Conferences.
- ↑ Reed, Jonathan (2000). "Link: An Extraterrestrial Odyssey". Official Site. Retrieved 2024-11-06.
- ↑ Sheaffer, Robert (2011). UFO Sightings: The Evidence. Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1573922135.
- ↑ Montaldo, Joseph (2015). "The Reed Alien Encounter: A Hoax Exposed". UFO Casebook. Retrieved 2024-11-06.
- Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls
- All articles with unsourced statements
- Articles with unsourced statements
- Encounters with non-human intelligent beings
- Conspiracy theories involving non-human intelligent beings
- 1996 in Washington (state)
- Encounters with non-human intelligent beings in the United States
- Jonathan Reed